The last time I went grocery shopping I bought a new type of muesli. I wasn’t shopping for cereal. I was crossing through the cereal aisle and this series of unusual boxes caught my eye. The boxes are each roughly the size and shape of a Kleenex box, have a matte finish and die cuts on the front and side that show you the real cereal inside (not an enlarged idealized photograph of the cereal as with most boxes). The cereal is made by Dorset Cereals, and the product lives up to the packaging. But it’s the packaging that really delighted me. I bought the product for the packaging—I admit I’m always looking for a good muesli, but I wasn’t looking for one that day.
The copywriting on the box perfectly complements the design. Take the weight, for example, which is labelled as “750g of unadulterated breakfast pleasure.” Cute, whimsical, without being cliché or saccharine. Something about the writing combined with the window into the contents convinced me that the packaging was sincere, that this company cared as much about making a good breakfast cereal as I cared about eating one.
I wish more companies paid as much attention to their packaging. The author of the Desi Geek blog writes about the packaging Seagate uses for the Simple Drive external hard drive. I bought a
Is buying products because you like their packaging stupid? Tyler Cowen is trying an experiment with books, buying books where the cover appeals to him without reading anything about the book. So far it’s working. His theory is that professionals who design the covers put a lot of effort into making the cover appeal to the people most likely to enjoy the book, so if we pick a book with a cover we like, we’ll tend to like the book, not because there’s a necessary connection between a book and its cover, but because there are teams of people working very hard to ensure such a connection exists. Why not trust them?
Maybe it’s the same with the cereal. On the other hand, maybe the packaging actually improves my experience of the product. Think about it however you like; maybe it puts me in a good mood when I pour the cereal into my bowl, or maybe it creates the right frame for the experience (they say you get what you expect out of something and here the packaging sets a good expectation). I’ve heard that experiments show that food actually tastes different depending on the packaging it comes out of, but I’ve never actually seen the evidence. In any case, the packaging seems likely to influence my subjective experience of the product, so I’ll think the product is good whether it is or not.
Then again, maybe that subjective evaluation is all there is. If so, if there’s no objectively good cereal, then the packaging might have as much an impact on the taste as the ingredients do.
The same could be true of books: the book’s cover and other features (its binding quality, typeface, margin sizes, etc.) might affect your perception of the book, the way attractive people sound more interesting even when they’re saying something mundane.
1 comment:
Perhaps this can be tied in with the Blink thesis. If we decide to pick a product based on it's packaging appeal (a blink decission) it (most often) will also satisfy many of the complex decision criteria we normally chose for a product.
Post a Comment